<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>scottwallick.com &#187; hyphens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottwallick.com/blog/tag/hyphens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottwallick.com</link>
	<description>An editor making more mistakes than corrections</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 04:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Less hyphens and less confusion</title>
		<link>http://scottwallick.com/blog/2007/10/less-hyphens-and-less-confusion/</link>
		<comments>http://scottwallick.com/blog/2007/10/less-hyphens-and-less-confusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyphens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwallick.com/blog/2007/10/less-hyphens-and-less-confusion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The precedent-following Oxford University Press has removed hyphens from about 16,000 words in their upcoming Shorter OED revision, according to Simon Rabinovitch of Reuters. Over-hyphenation is a problem. As is under-hyphenation. While ice-cream easily becomes ice cream, compound adjectives should remain &#8220;precedent-following.&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The precedent-following Oxford University Press has removed hyphens from about 16,000 words in their upcoming <cite>Shorter <abbr title="Oxford English Dictionary">OED</abbr></cite> revision, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/oddlyEnoughNews/idUSHAR15384620070921" title="Thousands of hyphens perish as English moves on" rel="external">according to Simon Rabinovitch of Reuters</a>.</p>
<p>Over-hyphenation is a problem. As is under-hyphenation. While ice-cream easily becomes ice cream, compound adjectives should remain &#8220;precedent-following.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottwallick.com/blog/2007/10/less-hyphens-and-less-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
